My 18 year-old daughter is awesome. She should be working with Wonkette...here's her blog entry about last night's debate:
Join the Army of Compassion or prepare to be smited!
"The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter." --Sir Winston Churchill
I was impressed with the turnout at the debate-watching party in the lounge downstairs. There were about twenty people there, which was actually really good. There were others watching in their rooms, but I like that enough people are interested in politics to actually watch a debate. And they say teenagers today are apathetic. Just some of us are. The stupid ones.
There were definitely highlights in the debate. And since I'm in a chipper mood (see mood icon below), I'm even going to include links. Don't you feel special? And, by the by, this is going to be a tad...what's the word?...partisan. But it's my blog and I can do what I like. I fully acknowledge and accept that Kerry made some mistakes in this debate. But those mistakes did not particularly amuse me. So I'm going to stick with the things that did entertain me. Feel free to respond in the comments. Just watch how hard you bash. And, by the by, the quotes from the debate are from this transcript.
Point #1: Oh, how the flip-flopper flips (and flops!).
Bush tonight: "Gosh, I just don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. It's kind of one of those exaggerations."
And, yeah...: "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
Point #2: The lies! They lies to me preciousss.
Bush tonight: In all due respect, I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations about -- oh, nevermind.
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02
Za? That's it. Just, za? WTF, man? Can't trust leading news organizations? Yeah, the media in this country kind of sucks because it lets politicians slide, but let's not trust the news? That damn liberal bias again or something? It's okay when they agree with you, but if they agree with Kerry (or they report facts that agree with Kerry) they're lying? Whatever man. WTFever.
Point #3: Look, kids! Name-calling is fun! And profitable!
How many times did Bush call Kerry "a liberal senator from Massachusetts"? Really, did somebody count? Because it just gets really fucking annoying. And Kerry is NOT the most liberal senator. He is TOTALLY not more liberal than Kennedy. The report that the Bushies got this from is misleading. Overall, Kerry has the llth most liberal lifetime record (still liberal, yes, but not crazy-liberal). Edwards is middle of the pack. THIS YEAR they were ranked 1st and 4th most liberal because they missed votes that count towards the ranking (separate issue altogether). But since when is liberal a dirty word? I won't go off on too much of a tangent, but I HATE how some people call others liberal like people used to call others commies. As if liberals are somehow out to destroy the nation. WE VALUE THE SAME THINGS (liberty, integrity, charity, responsibility, family, etc). We just have different ideas about how to implement them.
Point #4: Those activist judges, messing up everything.
Last time Bush said he'd never nominate a Supreme Court justice that supported the Dred Scott case. Yeah...I didn't think you would. But this time he tried to phrase the same thing in a slightly less ludicrous way: "What he's asking me is, will I have a litmus test for my judges? And the answer is, no, I will not have a litmus test. I will pick judges who will interpret the Constitution, but I'll have no litmus test...he [Kerry] clearly has a litmus test for his judges, which I disagree with." What was that you said about Kerry earlier, Bushie boy? Something about how you can't hide from your record? How about your record of nominating federal justices with obvious biases and clearly defined world views? Sorry that the links aren't super good, but they're the best I could come up with on short notice. However, they do take away that whole, "I don't appoint justices with preconceived notions of how the constitution should be interpreted!" shtick that Bush is trying to use. It's not that Bush is trying to appoint justices that agree with his views. EVERY PRESIDENT does that. Kerry would do the exact same thing. But Bush is trying to pretend his trend of appointing conservative judges with conservative viewpoints won't continue if he has the chance to appoint a Supreme Court Justice. Hello! It totally frickin' will. He is the ONLY one who won't say it. Even my poli sci book admits that "judges are similar to other politicians in that they have political goals and policy preferences and they act accordingly so that those goals are realized." Really? You don't say! Judges are human? They have biases? And this affects their judgment? Well, gosh darn it, ain't that something. And this whole thing about "activist judges" that Bush mentioned in regards to homosexual marriage? They're doing their JOB. They are interpreting the laws and the constitution. That's what they're paid to DO. Ever heard of Marbury v. Madison? It established the principle of judicial review. That was a case of judicial activism. Think it should never have taken place? What about Brown v. Board, huh? Want to take away THAT bit of judicial activism, Mr. President? And just because they're interpreting the laws and the constitution in ways that you don't agree doesn't mean they're being any more activist than the hundreds of conservative judges across the country doing THEIR jobs.
Point #5: Look at me try to win women over! I'm not a chauvinistic pig, I swear! Look, I married a strong woman!
The last question asked at the debate was stupid. Just...stupid. We are trying to decide on the next leader of the free world. This election is very important. And what was the last question of the last debate? This monstrosity: "All three of us are surrounded by very strong women. We're all married to strong women. Each of us have two daughters that make us very proud.I'd like to ask each of you, what is the most important thing you've learned from these strong women?" Oh. My. God. OMFG. THAT is the question? What about the bloody IMPORTANT issues that are facing this nation? Healthcare? Education? The economy? The working poor? Why not close on THOSE issues? Why the hell did the debate close with a question designed to pander to women voters? Oh look, Jim. This candidate likes strong women. He ain't so bad. WOMEN ARE NOT SO SHALLOW. We care about the ISSUES just as much as men. My criteria for president has never and will never include having a "strong wife". It's a nice bonus, but my criteria is more...I don't know...Will the president keep the country safe? Will the president work with other nations? Will the president look out for the poor and middle class? Will the president take the country in a direction that I want it to go? Lincoln's wife was rumored to have chased him down the street with a butcher knife. Didn't make him any less of a president.
Point #6: My Army of Compassion can crush YOUR Army of Compassion
Nothing much to this point. I just found it really funny that Bush twice mentioned "an army of compassion." To me that sounds like an oxymoron. I get what he was trying to say and all. But army+compassion=so compassionate we'll kill you if you don't save the drowning puppies fast enough. Maybe I should join the Army of Compassion. Then I can be a Soldier of Compassion. This Weapon of Compassion can smite your ass, and I'm not afraid to use it!
Anyways...that was my take on the debate. Not that I have strong opinions or anything. Good night and God bless (as I would say if I were running for office).
Then, Adam wrote this about Bonnie in his blog:
Wowzers
I'm feeling somewhat prolific today, so here's yet another post. My wee sister has a good commentary on last night's presidential debates up. Amusing and insightful. What do ya know? She should work for a network. Then at least they'd have someone COMPETENT.
Recent Comments